From owner-freebsd-mobile Thu Jul 27 14:34: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from hand.dotat.at (sfo-gw.covalent.net [207.44.198.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B59F37C0FE; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 14:34:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fanf@hand.dotat.at) Received: from fanf by hand.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.15 #3) id 13HvH7-0000Qj-00; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 21:33:05 +0000 Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 21:33:05 +0000 From: Tony Finch To: Mike Smith Cc: mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hdd sppin-down and syncer Message-ID: <20000727213305.B426@hand.dotat.at> References: <200007270806.BAA42887@mass.osd.bsdi.com> <20000727190406.A426@hand.dotat.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20000727190406.A426@hand.dotat.at> Organization: Covalent Technologies, Inc Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Tony Finch wrote: > >I left SYNCER_MAXDELAY as a compile-time option because the syncer's >work table has a fixed size and I was disinclined to make it dynamic >when I ought to be going to bed. But you think that that is a >reasonable thing to do and (other than keeping stuff in RAM longer >than before) this won't cause trouble? Hmm, should I increase kern.shutdown.kproc_shutdown_wait to allow more time for the syncer to exit at shutdown? Tony. -- f.a.n.finch fanf@covalent.net dot@dotat.at 382 ultra-cruel head fuel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message