From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 1 08:08:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DA0106566C for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rink@rink.nu) Received: from mx1.rink.nu (gloom.rink.nu [213.34.49.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B578FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.rink.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E150C6D423; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:08:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rink.nu Received: from mx1.rink.nu ([213.34.49.2]) by localhost (gloom.rink.nu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zjk+RqFar6fN; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:08:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mx1.rink.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 450086D41E; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:08:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:08:30 +0200 From: Rink Springer To: Nick Hibma Message-ID: <20090901080830.GA52168@rink.nu> References: <200909010931.16880.nick@van-laarhoven.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200909010931.16880.nick@van-laarhoven.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT Mailing List Subject: Re: Reducing noise in dmesg output X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:08:14 -0000 Hi Nick, On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 09:31:16AM +0200, Nick Hibma wrote: > dmesg is getting cluttered with random bits of irrelevant information which > either should be behind bootverbose or not at all present. Below two > locations where I intend to remove that information. The fact that a module > is loaded can be seen in the output of I'd say this is an useful change; the netsmb messages seem just leftovers from debugging and I never saw the need for the aperture size either (granted, I don't know what it indicates...) Regards, -- Rink P.W. Springer - http://rink.nu "Beauty often seduces us on the road to truth." - Dr. Wilson