Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:02:41 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/cdrtools-devel Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-descr.mkisofs pkg-install.rscsi pkg-plist pkg-plist.mkisofs ports/sysutils/cdrtools-devel/files patch-README.rscsi patch-RULES::rules.cnf patch-ad patch-cdda2wav::setuid.c ... Message-ID: <20030820070241.GA69497@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20030819163644.GB75086@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200308191625.h7JGPlZ7022976@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030819163644.GB75086@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:36:44AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:25:47AM -0700, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Log: > > Add sysutils/cdrtools-devel (currently at version 2.01a18) and > > Are you willing to call this sysutils/cdrtools-snapshot as this isn't a > port used for development. Our use of "-devel" in port names is > generally wrong and is confusing. Hmm, but we already call far too many ports like this (i.e. gimp-devel [1], and generally don't use silly separation for binaries/shared libs and headers/static libs like found in many linnex distros [2]. My point is that I don't see any issue here; Alexander did it all right, unless you prove me wrong. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030820070241.GA69497>