From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 29 16:53:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (GndRsh.dnsmgr.net [198.145.92.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2819914D45 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 16:53:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA21938; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 16:51:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199909292351.QAA21938@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed In-Reply-To: from Doug at "Sep 29, 1999 04:33:27 pm" To: Doug@gorean.org (Doug) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 16:51:37 -0700 (PDT) Cc: logix@foobar.franken.de (Harold Gutch), ben@skunk.org (Ben Rosengart), marcel@scc.nl (Marcel Moolenaar), current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Harold Gutch wrote: > > > Uhm, that's the way I see it being _right now_ as well. What I > > was thinking of, was that things would go smoother if you > > wouldn't upgrade _right now_, but in [insert some time in the > > near future here], as things would perhaps be "fixed" by then. > > There is no fix to make. If the binaries built by the current > sources cannot run unless the sigset_t stuff is in the kernel of the > machine that they are running on this problem will never be "fixed." Then the tools target is broken. The intent of the tools target it to build a running on the current system set of binaries that can build the FreeBSD tree, it the binaries in obj/tmp won't run on the current system something is broken. If it is broken, please back out the signal changes or fix the tools target. -- Rod Grimes - KD7CAX - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message