Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 16:51:37 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> To: Doug@gorean.org (Doug) Cc: logix@foobar.franken.de (Harold Gutch), ben@skunk.org (Ben Rosengart), marcel@scc.nl (Marcel Moolenaar), current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: sigset_t changes committed Message-ID: <199909292351.QAA21938@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909291632080.35014-100000@dt014n8c.san.rr.com> from Doug at "Sep 29, 1999 04:33:27 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Harold Gutch wrote: > > > Uhm, that's the way I see it being _right now_ as well. What I > > was thinking of, was that things would go smoother if you > > wouldn't upgrade _right now_, but in [insert some time in the > > near future here], as things would perhaps be "fixed" by then. > > There is no fix to make. If the binaries built by the current > sources cannot run unless the sigset_t stuff is in the kernel of the > machine that they are running on this problem will never be "fixed." Then the tools target is broken. The intent of the tools target it to build a running on the current system set of binaries that can build the FreeBSD tree, it the binaries in obj/tmp won't run on the current system something is broken. If it is broken, please back out the signal changes or fix the tools target. -- Rod Grimes - KD7CAX - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909292351.QAA21938>