From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Oct 1 21:54:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA02508 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 21:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebie.lemis.com (gregl1.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA02500 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 21:54:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) id OAA01058; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 14:24:21 +0930 (CST) Message-ID: <19971002142420.49578@lemis.com> Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 14:24:20 +0930 From: Greg Lehey To: "Jonathan E. Lyons" Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tty-level buffer overflows References: <3.0.3.32.19971001225109.006e88f0@midwest.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84e In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19971001225109.006e88f0@midwest.net>; from Jonathan E. Lyons on Wed, Oct 01, 1997 at 10:51:09PM -0500 Organisation: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8250 Fax: +61-8-8388-8250 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog Fight-Spam-Now: http://www.cauce.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, Oct 01, 1997 at 10:51:09PM -0500, Jonathan E. Lyons wrote: > Is this anything to be concerned about? I've got an X2 modem, with the port > speed set at 57600..... > > > Sep 28 16:42:11 cplkagan /kernel: sio0: 660 more tty-level buffer overflows > (total 660) > Sep 29 13:52:41 cplkagan /kernel: pid 18534 (ping), uid 0: exited on signal 3 > Sep 30 21:05:02 cplkagan /kernel: sio0: 100 more tty-level buffer overflows > (total 760) > Sep 30 22:00:02 cplkagan /kernel: sio0: 198 more tty-level buffer overflows > (total 958) > Sep 30 22:05:01 cplkagan /kernel: sio0: 199 more tty-level buffer overflows > (total 1157) > Sep 30 22:05:02 cplkagan /kernel: sio0: 1076 more tty-level buffer > overflows (total 2233) > Oct 1 05:30:02 cplkagan /kernel: sio0: 940 more tty-level buffer overflows > (total 3173) Yes. With PPP, each of these means a lost packet, which is expensive. This shouldn't happen. Is the machine slow or heavily loaded? Otherwise you might be losing interrupts. Greg