From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 14 13:06:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267BC106566C; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:06:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from mx.utwente.nl (mx1.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971678FC12; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by mx.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n9ED4KeR016873; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:04:20 +0200 From: Pieter de Goeje To: Matthias Apitz Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:04:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20091011062419.GA2168@current.Sisis.de> <200910141433.10715.pieter@degoeje.nl> <20091014124410.GA4606@current.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20091014124410.GA4606@current.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200910141504.19965.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact icts.servicedesk@utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: kde-freebsd@kde.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Martin Wilke Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] 9-CURRENT (r197801) && artsd of kde-3.5.10_2 gives SIGSEGV X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:06:47 -0000 On Wednesday 14 October 2009 14:44:10 Matthias Apitz wrote: > El d=EDa Wednesday, October 14, 2009 a las 02:33:10PM +0200, Pieter de Go= eje=20 escribi=F3: > > On Wednesday 14 October 2009 08:32:21 Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > I think only supporting KDE4 is not a good idea. IMHO, KDE4 is a bit > > > heading in the wrong direction. KDE4 is unusable for a lot of (older) > > > hardware and is unusable, at least, for smaller laptops or netbooks, > > > just because of the resources it is consuming. If the KDE team is > > > leaving KDE3, and I don't expect further development, but only > > > compability with upcoming FreeBSD ABI changes (or whatever), than we > > > will not have KDE3 anymore from 9-CURRENT (or even from 8.0-RELEASE) > > > anymore. Which would be a real pity :-( > > > > I'm suprised someone actually uses artsd. As a fellow KDE3 user on > > 9-CURRENT (on beefy hardware btw), I didn't have this issue because I > > always disable > > (btw: I'm using KDE3 on 8-CURRENT on my beefy laptop too); > > > artsd because I don't want sound notifications. As long as people are > > using KDE3 I don't think it will die because people just like you will > > find the problem(s) and fix it. > > > > That said, I couldn't reproduce the problem (artsd works fine if I enab= le > > it). Uname: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #2: Fri Oct 9 08:37:37 CEST 2009 i386 > > what is the SVN rev number of your kernel (mine is r197801) and how aRts > came to your system, via /usr/ports or how? I can't give you an exact revision (sources were obtained with csup) but=20 r197869 should be pretty close. Arts was build using ports/audio/arts=20 (version 1.5.10_2,1). Another PC running RELENG_8 (amd64) from Sep. 24 also has a working arts (s= ame=20 version, also compiled/installed via ports). =2D Pieter