From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 23:13:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D5F37B401; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:13:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BC043F3F; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:13:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org (12-232-168-4.client.attbi.com[12.232.168.4]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53) with ESMTP id <20030407061308053002lvgde>; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 06:13:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA58098; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:13:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:13:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Jeff Roberson In-Reply-To: <20030407010642.E86645-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Daniel Eischen cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org cc: core@freebsd.org cc: David Xu Subject: Re: KSE signals broken by 1:1 commit. X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 06:13:09 -0000 Hey, you're back! I thought you were away for a few more days. On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > I suspect that it can wait as well. I had reports from a user that this > didn't break kse but I didn't specifically test it myself. People are > using thr now though so I'd hope we could avoid breaking it. KSE signals > didn't work well enough at the time that I commited thr to be too > concerned. It seemed as if more work was required to get it right anyway. > > Could you please tell me exactly what you want and let me implement it > instead of backing out working code. If you just want a per process or > kseg mask we can do that although I'm not sure if this is correct. > > Really julian, after all your complaints about people asking you to > backout code that broke the build I'd think you'd be a little more > reasonable. I'm not asking for a backout.. I just want to be not nailed to a tree if it turnes out that we cause some side effects in 1:1 when we try fix the broken-ness introduced by it. if you are available, We can pass patches past you so the whole question is moot. I was worried because I thought you were not available. > > Cheers, > Jeff > >