From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 19:20:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79DC16A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 19:20:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EF543D41 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 19:20:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iA9JKPU3004122 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 19:20:25 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iA9JKPf9004121; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 19:20:25 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 19:20:25 GMT Message-Id: <200411091920.iA9JKPf9004121@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Maxim Konovalov Subject: Re: kern/73719: Page fault in bpf_mtap () X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Maxim Konovalov List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 19:20:26 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/73719; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Maxim Konovalov To: Vladimir Ivanov Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/73719: Page fault in bpf_mtap () Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 22:15:18 +0300 (MSK) On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, 19:00-0000, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > The following reply was made to PR kern/73719; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Vladimir Ivanov > To: Maxim Konovalov > Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: kern/73719: Page fault in bpf_mtap () > Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 21:58:06 +0300 > > Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > >So could you please try debug.mpsafenet=0? AFAIK debug.mpsafenet=1 is > >very far from the production state. > > > > > > > I don't think so. I can't say that GIANT affects system stability > significantly. > Anyway, we've found a bug and this bug may be fixed (e.g. with above > patch). Why not ? > :-) Because I do not understand what is the root of the bug and what your diff fixes, do you? -- Maxim Konovalov