From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 20 16:02:25 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6663B16A4CE; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 16:02:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [213.147.57.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F0EC343D55; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 16:02:24 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from ppp83-237-98-68.pppoe.mtu-net.ru ([83.237.98.68])
	by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x)
	id 1CVXgq-000Amz-0d; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:02:22 +0300
Message-ID: <419F6A93.8080606@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:02:27 +0300
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200411201420.iAKEK7q2053614@sakura.ninth-nine.com>
In-Reply-To: <200411201420.iAKEK7q2053614@sakura.ninth-nine.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "proxy.ciam.ru",
	hasmessagelabel	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.souldshould
	be fixed even without asking. -- Sem. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.8 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	--------------------------------------------------addr 1)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:18:36 +0000
cc: itetcu@people.tecnik93.com
cc: green@FreeBSD.org
cc: krion@FreeBSD.org
cc: kde@FreeBSD.org
cc: nick@netdot.net
cc: Lars.Koeller@Uni-Bielefeld.DE
cc: ume@FreeBSD.org
cc: thierry@FreeBSD.org
cc: tremere@cainites.net
cc: adamw@FreeBSD.org
cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org
cc: demon@FreeBSD.org
cc: mwicks@kettering.edu
cc: bms@FreeBSD.org
cc: gh@ghaering.de
Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] status of databases/sqlite* is too bad.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 16:02:25 -0000

Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> 	2. databases/sqlite2 sould be connected to ports system.

I think it's just an ommision and should be fixed even without asking.

-- 
Sem.