From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 21:24:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FA07F8; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Received: from duck.symmetricom.us (duck.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9532D8BA; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from damnhippie.dyndns.org (daffy.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.218]) by duck.symmetricom.us (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0ILOn8V014004; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:24:50 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r0ILOljh008194; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:24:47 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: IBM blade server abysmal disk write performances From: Ian Lepore To: Wojciech Puchar In-Reply-To: References: <6C0B86E6-195C-4D35-AE40-3D2F9F6D28FB@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:24:47 -0700 Message-ID: <1358544287.32417.251.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Scott Long , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Dieter BSD , scottl@FreeBSD.org, gibbs@FreeBSD.org, mjacob@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:24:51 -0000 On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 22:18 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > and anyone who enabled SATA WC or complained about I/O slowness > > would be forced into Siberian salt mines for the remainder of their lives. > > so reserve a place for me there. Yeah, me too. I prefer to go for all-out performance with separate risk mitigation strategies. I wouldn't set up a client datacenter that way, but it's wholly appropriate for what I do with this machine. -- Ian