From owner-freebsd-current Sat Aug 2 13:45:21 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA13059 for current-outgoing; Sat, 2 Aug 1997 13:45:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA13054 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 1997 13:45:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id NAA16130; Sat, 2 Aug 1997 13:44:22 -0700 (PDT) To: dmaddox@scsn.net cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports-current/packages-current discontinued In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 02 Aug 1997 14:38:45 EDT." <19970802143845.26672@scsn.net> Date: Sat, 02 Aug 1997 13:44:22 -0700 Message-ID: <16126.870554662@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [Please trim your cc's - this is getting out of control] > This seems to me to be a very silly attitude. Today's -current is > tomorrow's release... If this foolishness of continuing to maintain > tcl in the base tre e is not stopped _now_, we will have to live > with it for the next N releases. _Please_ end it *now*. This argument is hardly likely to win many points. If this matter is to be concluded reasonably then it's going to be because the principals involved agreed to sit down and discuss it *rationally*. Demanding that people do things "now" is just fanning the flames and bringing yet more onwonted emotion to an already overly-emotional issue. In other words, Donald, you're not being part of the solution, you're being part of the problem. Either change that aspect of your debating style or kindly stay out of the discussion since you're not helping. Jordan