From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Oct 4 09:07:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA21247 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 4 Oct 1997 09:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from word.smith.net.au (ppp20.portal.net.au [202.12.71.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA21237; Sat, 4 Oct 1997 09:07:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from word.smith.net.au (localhost.smith.net.au [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA01775; Sun, 5 Oct 1997 01:34:30 +0930 (CST) Message-Id: <199710041604.BAA01775@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Douglas Carmichael cc: phk@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More developments in the kernel compile with Pentium-GCC In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 04 Oct 1997 10:08:59 EST." <199710041508.KAA00373@dcarmich.pr.mcs.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 05 Oct 1997 01:34:29 +0930 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > When I boot it with no options, it panics with the message "Fatal double fault" and then does: ... > However, when I boot with the -v option, it boots and runs fine (as I can see) and runs as fast as a bat out of h*** compared to the normal FreeBSD kernel. "pgcc produces fast but wrong code" - we have known this for some time. What would be more helpful would be for you to help the pgcc people fix their code generation so that it produced fast and correct code. 8) mike