From owner-freebsd-net Tue Oct 3 11:30:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from urban.iinet.net.au (urban.iinet.net.au [203.59.24.231]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F54537B502 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elischer.org (reggae-34-48.nv.iinet.net.au [203.59.167.48]) by urban.iinet.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA25185; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 02:29:28 +0800 Message-ID: <39DA256D.8077E698@elischer.org> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 11:29:01 -0700 From: Julian Elischer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garrett Wollman , net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SACK in FreeBSD TCP. References: <39DA1CEE.ADCEA934@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Garrett Wollman wrote: > > < said: > > > In the past I had something to do with some systems that used > > "vegas-like" > > The bug in Vegas was that it broke congestion control. > > -GAWollman check out the first article on this page .. http://www.cs.inf.ethz.ch/~bolliger/ for an interesting analysis.... Unfortunatly New-reno was not in the comparison, but your suggestion that Vegas broke congestion control is not supported. Another more relevant reference is the LINUX Vegas page: http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/cardwell/linux-vegas/ They have quite a few results there... Most interesting is the comment that SACK can also produce the same gain, and that SACK+Vegas gives littel extra gain. However for Non-SACK clients, Vegas can give good results without relying on the client to upgrade.. Also they point out that Vegas is a better net-citizen in that it tends to use up less buffers in routers in the cloud. Anyway It looks like there are definitly lots of improvements we can still make.. -- __--_|\ Julian Elischer / \ julian@elischer.org ( OZ ) World tour 2000 ---> X_.---._/ presently in: Perth v To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message