From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 06:30:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897ED16A41F for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 06:30:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE30843D48 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 06:30:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0N6UC4G067065 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 06:30:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0N6UCOZ067061; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 06:30:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 06:30:12 GMT Message-Id: <200601230630.k0N6UCOZ067061@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Sergey Matveychuk Cc: Subject: Re: ports/92146: [NEW PORT] misc/newer: An implementation of AT&T Research UNIX V8 newer(1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sergey Matveychuk List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 06:30:13 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/92146; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sergey Matveychuk To: "Jeffrey H. Johnson" Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, CPE1704TKS@bellsouth.net Subject: Re: ports/92146: [NEW PORT] misc/newer: An implementation of AT&T Research UNIX V8 newer(1) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:20:37 +0300 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jeffrey H. Johnson wrote: > On January 22, 2006 9:56 PM +0300 Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > >>What is a difference the utility to system newer(1)? > > > System newer(1)?! > > I don't have that on my machine here. Is it part of some other port, > or is still in 6? It's not in bin, usr.bin or usr.sbin at least... > > If it is part of another port, we should note that, and add a CONFLICT. > > If I'm totally off-base here, I apologize in advance. You're right. I've just done 'man newer' and thought it was a system one. - -- Sem. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD1HW1TclL2LcfYF0RAmQlAKCXNX+pkcj9n+CLk7+RlhEO7mkWFgCgyd1T maAq0vVltJmjnL5k39XBqT8= =Q83L -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----