From owner-freebsd-current Sat Oct 30 12:47:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B9F15144 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 1999 12:47:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA79073; Sat, 30 Oct 1999 12:47:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Bruce Albrecht Cc: chris@calldei.com, FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -current build fails In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Oct 1999 14:35:56 CDT." <14363.18588.45487.54695@celery.zuhause.org> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 1999 12:47:05 -0700 Message-ID: <79070.941312825@localhost> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I think a lot of the people who run older versions of -current, and > upgrade sporadically, have done so because there are particular things > missing out of -STABLE that they need (or want). Which is a fair point, and hopefully we'll be branching 4.0 sooner this time so the wait is not so long. > They also know that nobody's going to spend a lot of time on any > problems they encounter unless they're running a very current > -current. This is another fair point, but it still does not exonerate those same users from reading the -current mailing list on a semi-religious basis. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message