From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 22 13:33:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E23AE3; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:33:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DA18FC12; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09C51B91E; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:33:44 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Warner Losh Subject: Re: svn commit: r241757 - head/usr.sbin/pciconf Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:31:09 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p20; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201210192248.q9JMmMpt093234@svn.freebsd.org> <201210200830.26755.jhb@freebsd.org> <12563773-B5F9-4F48-A1A7-45E15296F9C4@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <12563773-B5F9-4F48-A1A7-45E15296F9C4@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201210220931.09563.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:33:44 -0400 (EDT) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Warner Losh X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:33:45 -0000 On Sunday, October 21, 2012 11:11:09 pm Warner Losh wrote: > > On Oct 20, 2012, at 6:30 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Friday, October 19, 2012 06:48:22 PM Warner Losh wrote: > >> Author: imp > >> Date: Fri Oct 19 22:48:22 2012 > >> New Revision: 241757 > >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/241757 > >> > >> Log: > >> Indent ecaps the same way we indent caps. > > > > This was on purpose so the '=' signs line up > > It makes it hard to parse otherwise... Perhaps the equal lining up should be documented? Or at least be fixed to match everything else. When ecaps were added the broke indentation... > > I'm happy to fix the alignment issue. Alternatively you would have to reindent everything else to allow for the larger 'ecap XXXX[XXX]' width. You could do that if you wanted to instead. -- John Baldwin