From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Dec 23 6:52:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A8515633 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 06:52:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #3) id 1219ba-000Jm3-00; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 14:52:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA21020; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 14:52:38 GMT (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 14:52:38 +0000 (GMT) From: Jonathon McKitrick To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: Brian Anderson , "Stephen F. Tanner" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: unix games... Re: ??? In-Reply-To: <47728.945944361@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote: >are massive resource hungry hogs. Our scheduler is optimized for many >processes, some long-running and some short-lived cpu-bound hogs. I've heard MS people say Linux's scheduler is dogmeat compared to NT's. Is ours superior to Linux's? -jm To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message