From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 28 15:55:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rockstar.stealthgeeks.net (h-66-134-120-173.LSANCA54.covad.net [66.134.120.173]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AF4B37B402 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:55:21 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 385 invoked by uid 1001); 28 Jan 2002 23:55:20 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jan 2002 23:55:20 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:55:20 -0800 (PST) From: Patrick Greenwell To: Matthew Whelan Cc: "M. Warner Losh" , Nate Williams , , , Subject: Re: Proposed Solution To Recent "firewall_enable" Thread. [Please Read] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020128155135.X342-100000@rockstar.stealthgeeks.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Matthew Whelan wrote: > Isn't this starting to get a bit big a change for -STABLE? (unless you have > an interim rc.network that understands both the old and new, translates old > to new, and flashes a big warning that you change, or something :) My fault for opening this can of worms on -stable. The discussion/proposed changes probably do belong on -current. I've just never run a -CURRENT system and don't subscribe to -current... /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Patrick Greenwell Stealthgeeks,LLC. Operations Consulting http://www.stealthgeeks.net \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message