Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:02:33 +0800 From: "Al.Aeefyu" <aeefyu@gmail.com> To: Andrew J Caines <a.j.caines@halplant.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports mail/pflogstats Message-ID: <793eaa5204061800022183d64a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20040618053345.GA33666@hal9000.halplant.com> References: <793eaa52040613194711312355@mail.gmail.com> <20040618053345.GA33666@hal9000.halplant.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 01:33:45 -0400, Andrew J Caines <a.j.caines@halplant.com> wrote: > > Al, > > > A recent upgrade of postfix (also from -ports) have resulted > > in an error when running pflogstats with the argument "--type=uce" > > It runs fine for me, though having not used this option before I can't say > if there's something wrong with the output. > > # pflogstats --type=uce < /var/log/maillog > > > Previously was using postfix-2.0.x, and --type=uce was running fine. > > It is broken now with postfix-2.1.1 with the error "No Data Found! " > > # pkg_info -I postfix-* pflogstats-* > pflogstats-1.0.1,1 Postfix Log Statistics Reporter > postfix-2.1.1,1 A secure alternative to widely-used Sendmail I can confirm i have the exact ports installed > I don't see a "No Data Found!" error. OK. There's no longer a "No Data Found!" error. (maybe it was ignorance). But the output basically spits out total of zero UCEs What I actually get is as follows: [1440][root@beta: ports]$ pflogstats --type=uce < /var/log/maillog Statistics generated by: pflogstats.pl 1.0.1 (module version sum: 1.03) (P) & (C) by Dr. Peter Bieringer, AERAsec - based on pflogsumm.pl by James S. Seymour ############################################################## UCE statistics ############################################################## ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Timerange: Fri Jun 18 00:00:00 2004 - Fri Jun 18 14:49:31 2004 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ====================================================== Per recipient domain Begin: Fri Jun 18 00:00:00 2004 (localtime) End : Fri Jun 18 14:49:31 2004 (localtime) ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Total : 0 ====================================================== ====================================================== Per sender domain Begin: Fri Jun 18 00:00:00 2004 (localtime) End : Fri Jun 18 14:49:31 2004 (localtime) ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Total : 0 ====================================================== ====================================================== Per relay Begin: Fri Jun 18 00:00:00 2004 (localtime) End : Fri Jun 18 14:49:31 2004 (localtime) ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Total : 0 ====================================================== ====================================================== Per blocklist Begin: Fri Jun 18 00:00:00 2004 (localtime) End : Fri Jun 18 14:49:31 2004 (localtime) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total : 0 ====================================================== > > (Let me assure you there's nothing wrong with the logs passed to > > pflogstats. > > Maybe, but Wietse continues to stick to his assertion that the log format > is undocumented and subject to change. It does change, too! Agree =:-) > > Message sent to the maintainer has yet to receive a reply for over a week now. > His 'puter died and had to be replaced by the latest technology[1] and his > employer has been treating him like a roman galley slave. > > [1] http://halplant.com:88/systems.html The bastard! =:-) Thanks for catching up though. Anyways, a good read! Agree with the definition of "good desktop" is very personal. Thanks -- ------------------- aeefyu -------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?793eaa5204061800022183d64a>