From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 8 21:36:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F35216A417 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:36:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA0243D49 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:36:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ghv5m-0008Au-Bq for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:36:19 +0100 Received: from 89-172-58-142.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([89.172.58.142]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:36:18 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 89-172-58-142.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:36:18 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:36:01 +0100 Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <45524517.1060501@cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-58-142.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) In-Reply-To: <45524517.1060501@cisco.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: SCTP is in the Tree :-) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 21:36:50 -0000 Randall Stewart wrote: > Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) - is a reliable message > oriented transport protocol which provides network fault tolerance > It supports multiple streams and multihoming. A very good overview > of the protocol is given in RFC 3268. Looks cool :) It's under IP so it's routable, but I imagine it probably needs routers along the way to know about it in order to use the more advanced features?