From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 6 12:40:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA10106566B for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:40:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-arch@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7C28FC0A for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:40:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-arch@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LfZMG-0004qN-Va for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:40:56 +0000 Received: from 195.208.174.178 ([195.208.174.178]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:40:56 +0000 Received: from vadim_nuclight by 195.208.174.178 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:40:56 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org From: Vadim Goncharov Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Nuclear Lightning @ Tomsk, TPU AVTF Hostel Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <20090301153010.GA58942@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <49AAFD92.105@elischer.org> <8EBEEE24-6473-411D-AE3F-C4D1D3897E51@gmail.com> <20090302190157.GA33704@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.208.174.178 X-Comment-To: Luigi Rizzo User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: spliting kernel ipfw source ? (also involves sctp) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vadim_nuclight@mail.ru List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:40:59 -0000 Hi Luigi Rizzo! On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 20:01:57 +0100; Luigi Rizzo wrote about 'Re: spliting kernel ipfw source ? (also involves sctp)': >>>>>Hi, I am planning to split netinet/ip_fw2.c in a number of smaller files >>>>>to make it more manageable, and while i do this I would also like to >>>>>move the files related to ipfw2 (namely ip_fw*c) to a better place. Any >>>>>objection to moving them to sys/netinet/ipfw2 ? Also, I can't help [...] > To further clarify, my plan is the following: > - leave ip_fw.h and ip_dummynet.h in /sys/netinet in case > userland code is dependent on their location; > - create /sys/netinet/ipfw/ to hold the kernel .c files related to > ipfw and possibly dummynet (and also their private headers if any); Exactly that and nothing more? I'm currently working on extending ipfw for Foundation with userland interface will be changed (and I thinking about introducing modules), what else do you plan to do? -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight]