From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Feb 13 20:53:29 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA05721
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 20:53:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA05716
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 20:53:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost)
	by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA12128;
	Thu, 13 Feb 1997 23:53:34 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 23:53:33 -0500 (EST)
From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
To: Jake Hamby <hamby@aris.jpl.nasa.gov>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Sun Workshop compiler vs. GCC?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970213161306.10210C-100000@aris>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970213234236.10804I-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 13 Feb 1997, Jake Hamby wrote:

> I don't want to sound like an advertisement for Sun, it's just that
> they're so Buzzword Enriched, they will make people believe they have the
> best server platform.

On the whole, I think we would be better off having people
believe Sun's hype about Solaris than believing Microsoft's hype
about NT.  FreeBSD would have a much greater chance of
successfully infiltrating a solaris environment than it would an
NT environment.   :)

-john