From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 7 12:34:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3EF106566C; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 12:34:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E468FC12; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 12:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 Jul 2012 08:34:42 -0400 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BVR65451; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 08:34:41 -0400 Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 Jul 2012 08:34:42 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20472.11489.7749.213672@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 08:34:41 -0400 To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <4FF4B427.1010808@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FF4B427.1010808@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Sayetsky Anton , Baptiste Daroussin , FreeBSD Current , "Hartmann, O." , bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice: X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:34:43 -0000 Doug Barton writes: > > /me officially gives up with that libreoffice port, open for > > new volunteers > > If you don't have time to work on the port, then don't, that's > not a problem. But throwing a hissy fit here doesn't help at all. Cut tha man some slack. As far as I can tell, he's been point - and often _only_ - person wrangling the herd of 250 pound cats that is LibreOffice (and posibly OpenOffice before that). At this he has done a superior job. However, there has recently been {subtle, tenacious} breakage that a) is not his fault, b) he's gotten a lot of complaints about from people who don't understand what's involved (you're not on that list), even though c) he's been working hard to find and fix the problem. If he wants a moment to vent, and maybe ask "is this worth it?" ... he's earned it. Robert Huff