From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 17 23:04:31 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D7D1916A4CE; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:04:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta7.pltn13.pbi.net (mta7.pltn13.pbi.net [64.164.98.8])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B0D9A43D1D; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:04:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(385fa56594448700dbca39883452cb0d@adsl-67-119-53-203.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net
	[67.119.53.203])i2I74UXY021198;	Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:04:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 0447551A46; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:04:24 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:04:24 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Burkard Meyendriesch <bm@malepartus.de>
Message-ID: <20040318070424.GA77223@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20040318075835.6a2618bd.bm@malepartus.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040318075835.6a2618bd.bm@malepartus.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: amd64 -CURRENT: portinstall x11/kde3 fails, missing shared
	libraries
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:04:32 -0000


--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 07:58:35AM +0100, Burkard Meyendriesch wrote:

> Are there any differences in making ports between i386 STABLE and amd64
> CURRENT? What is going wrong? What can I do to solve this?

Compare the build logs of the openldap port from i386 and amd64; it's
possible the build is turning off shared library support because of a
buggy configure script, or something.

Kris

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAWUn3Wry0BWjoQKURAlEsAKDTFDPjUwp/y1qcZwIQ7tkI7sMfNQCg/pNA
l53keeCojgjsG+egGRd9xgE=
=8iA9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v--