From owner-freebsd-current Tue Aug 20 13:18:19 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA29956 for current-outgoing; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 13:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sequent.kiae.su (sequent.kiae.su [193.125.152.6]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA29935 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 13:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by sequent.kiae.su id AA01962 (5.65.kiae-2 ); Wed, 21 Aug 1996 00:15:41 +0400 Received: by sequent.KIAE.su (UUMAIL/2.0); Wed, 21 Aug 96 00:15:40 +0400 Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.ru (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA00660; Wed, 21 Aug 1996 00:12:52 +0400 (MSD) Message-Id: <199608202012.AAA00660@nagual.ru> Subject: Re: Secure telnet duplicating: secure & eBones both... In-Reply-To: <199608201543.RAA26357@grumble.grondar.za> from "Mark Murray" at "Aug 20, 96 05:43:19 pm" To: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray) Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 00:12:52 +0400 (MSD) Cc: current@FreeBSD.org From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (Andrey A. Chernov) Organization: self X-Class: Fast X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL25 (25)] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Contrary to what you may think you see in the makefiles, The only form > of secure telnet we have right now is Kerberised Telnet. Set some of > those macros and see how far you get. > > Right now there is RSA and SPX, Neither of which work and neither of > which are particularly standard (I speak under correction) as telnet > authenticators/encryptors. I am aware that only Kerberos part is working now. But, 1) What we plan to do when other parts will works in future versions, move it back? (it was my question from my first message, unanswered) 2) It can be build without Kerberos, encryption parts not active in this case. But at least encryption protocol negotiation still works. And yet one my question, unanswered in all messages: what are the reasons to move it? As I guess, your logic is: if only Kerberos part works, move it to eBones. In this case see my (1). I.e. I see _no_ harm leaving it in secure and see (1) harm to moving it to eBones. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/