From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Jun 21 09:37:40 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA22863
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 09:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA22856
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 09:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id JAA18436; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 09:33:55 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199606211633.JAA18436@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: The FreeBSD Way
To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com (Andreas Klemm)
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 09:33:55 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, nate@sri.MT.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.94.960621071929.328A-100000@klemm.gtn.com> from "Andreas Klemm" at Jun 21, 96 07:21:34 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > I'm against the inclusion of TCL in the main line source tree
> > for the same reason that I don't believe an "add user" script should
> > be written in PERL: because it limits the reusuability of the code
> > by blurring its boundries to the point that the algorithm is not
> > fundamentally seperable from the interface implementation.
> 
> Generally I share your sight, but even SunSofts Solaris 2.x uses 
> tk in the main system...

If all the System V vendors jumped off a cliff... ?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.