From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 12:13:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71D216A41F for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 12:13:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from babkin@verizon.net) Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net (vms046pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951D143D46 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 12:13:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from babkin@verizon.net) Received: from vms064.mailsrvcs.net ([192.168.1.1]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0IMJ00LH0TY9X000@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 07:13:21 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 07:13:21 -0500 (CDT) From: Sergey Babkin To: Mike Silbersack , "Kamal R. Prasad" Message-id: <8656351.1126268001929.JavaMail.root@vms064.mailsrvcs.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 12:28:33 +0000 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: JFS2 on freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: babkin@users.sf.net List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 12:13:33 -0000 >From: Mike Silbersack > >On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Kamal R. Prasad wrote: > >> would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core? >> thanks >> -kamal > >There are many things that would be of interest to FreeBSD users, but >that's not a good reason to start a project. If you're motivated only >because you think others desire your work, you'll probably give up when >you have to start dealing with all the realities of the project. However, >if you're motivated because *you* want to port JFS2, then you'll probably >do a good job of it. > >So, of course support for new filesystem support is good, but my personal >opinion is that JFS2 isn't worth your time, for two reasons: > >a) Even if it's BSD licensed, it's unlikely to displace UFS as our >default filesystem. > >b) It's not a widely used filesystem, so it doesn't really increase our >interoperability with other OSes. > >OTOH, updating our ext2 code, or ntfs code (if that's even possible) would >be something of use to many people, I suspect. Why not go for ext3 instead of JFS then? It has journaling in it. -SB