From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 29 00:27:50 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD46106566C
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:27:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from marquis@roble.com)
Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5598FC14
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:27:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5])
	by mx5.roble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E1E67833
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:15:45 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:15:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20110128120031.21B5A1065763@hub.freebsd.org>
References: <20110128120031.21B5A1065763@hub.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <20110129002750.ADD46106566C@hub.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: bump of PORTREVISION mandatory?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:27:50 -0000

"Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Would it make sense to have the making process sleep for a few seconds
> or have the user to press a key before proceeding? If I didn't wait for
> the lines I wouldn't really have noticed it.

Why not do one or the other depending on the terminal:

   tty >/dev/null 2>&1
   if [ $? = 0 ]; then
     echo -n "$msg.  Continue [Y/^C]: "
     read x y z
   else
     echo "$msg.  Continuing in 10s, ^C to abort ..."
     sleep 10
   fi

Roger Marquis