Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 06:46:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> To: Alexander Langer <alex@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>, Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patches rules (Was: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/qpopper Makefile ports/mail/qpopper/patchespatch-manpages ports/mail/qpopper/pkg MESSAGE PLISTports/mail/qpopper/scripts pre-install) Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0007190627310.26775-100000@blues.jpj.net> In-Reply-To: <20000719122538.E36043@cichlids.cichlids.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The handbook section that was mentioned says to name patches according to "the sequence in which the patches will be applied" and gives no other reason for the scheme. Then it goes on to say "you should avoid having more than one patch fix the same file" which AFAICT is the only time the sequence would matter. -- Trevor Johnson http://jpj.net/~trevor/gpgkey.txt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.4.21.0007190627310.26775-100000>