Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Jan 2016 21:25:21 +0300
From:      Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To:        mokhi <mokhi64@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: thread-unsafety problems as spl*() ones are NOP
Message-ID:  <20160130182521.GM88527@zxy.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <CAByVWPUz2nMuWncsv648BGHReBvtP3r1afAz0LC%2BWD5tikdYDA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAByVWPWuqdtZ-5p2%2BvGf4v%2BPjjCBkiTQSsZQ06vk-f=bx_TQrQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAByVWPWQJ1wP95S59SiWWBa0k9j2%2Bu1az-D04_V1voo99CxqCw@mail.gmail.com> <20160130180256.GT37895@zxy.spb.ru> <CAByVWPUz2nMuWncsv648BGHReBvtP3r1afAz0LC%2BWD5tikdYDA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 09:42:13PM +0330, mokhi wrote:

> i currently only wanna do patch on kbd.c (because i'm sure there is a
> thread-unsafety)
> and i don't want to add anything to spltty() nor splx(), i just wanna
> add things under where they've been used.
> isn't problem with using mutex/spin/lock/unlock etc there?

yes.
currenly spltty act as mutex_lock(&spltty_mutex), like global lock for
all used files. this is also inter-files lock, not only lock inside
only kbd.c.
you need patch all files. all using spltty need to remove
simultaneously.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160130182521.GM88527>