From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Sep 12 18: 8:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mail-relay.eunet.no (mail-relay.eunet.no [193.71.71.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7255A37B43E; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 18:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from login-1.eunet.no (login-1.eunet.no [193.75.110.2]) by mail-relay.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.3/GN) with ESMTP id DAA55937; Wed, 13 Sep 2000 03:08:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from localhost (mbendiks@localhost) by login-1.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA85526; Wed, 13 Sep 2000 03:08:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) X-Authentication-Warning: login-1.eunet.no: mbendiks owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 03:08:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Marius Bendiksen To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Device probing... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Good idea, except it's hard to debug unless you have a working ddb or gdb or > > something (which is very rare these days for the machines I usually work on). > Make the message spooler conditional on DEBUG not being defined. Rather, I think, make the buffering and sorting code conditional. Use the spooler anyway, but have it act mostly as a printf() passthrough when DEBUG is defined. Marius To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message