Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 07 Jan 2000 09:23:06 -0500
From:      Peter Schwenk <schwenk@math.udel.edu>
To:        advocacy@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: license (no longer Re: uptimes, Woo Hoo)
Message-ID:  <3875F6CA.DBCAFA8B@math.udel.edu>
References:  <200001071413.JAA17543@blackhelicopters.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I guess I just don't understand why any software business would want to have anything
to do with true Open Source software.  Sure, you could charge for support and service,
but, at least in the home/personal market, nobody likes to pay for that stuff.  I can
see corporate licensees buying support, however.  True Open Source software seems to
make it impossible to make big money, which companies like to do.

Don't get me wrong.  I LOVE free software.  I use it all the time.  I just don't see
how ALL software can be free and we can still have a software industry.  I'm a dope,
I guess.

Michael Lucas wrote:

> >From a business standpoint, yes, the BSDL is delightful.  "Here, have
> this, it's free, do whatever you want with it."  What business
> wouldn't like that?
>
> But what do *we* get out of it?  Simply the satisfaction of knowing
> your work is in a photocopier's brain?
>
> ==ml
>
> > It appears to me, at least from a business standpoint, that the BSDL is the
> > free-est of all in that all it requires of the licensee is recognition of the
> > source of the work.  I think that's why Apple's used it for it's upcoming Mac OS
> > X.  They can use the FreeBSD source and still not be required to ship source with
> > their product.  That way they can keep whatever fancy stuff they've done to it
> > private and keep a competitive advantage.  Not very cool from a GPL, Open Source
> > standpoint, but I'm sure Apple likes it.  I thought I heard a rumor that Apple has
> > contributed some source back to the FreeBSD project, but that's just hearsay.
> >
> > Michael Lucas wrote:
> >
> > > So, is there any highfalutin' purpose behind the BSDL?  Or is it as
> > > nonpolitical as it appears to be?  Having had this argument many
> > > times, I'd like something better than "we don't care"; from an
> > > advocacy point of view, that never comes across well.

--
PETER SCHWENK                                    |  UNIX System Administrator
Department of Mathematical Sciences              |  University of Delaware
schwenk@math.udel.edu                            |  (302)831-0437 <-NEW!!!





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3875F6CA.DBCAFA8B>