Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:54:14 -0600 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Yoshihiro Ota <ota@j.email.ne.jp> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Thomas Abthorpe <tabthorpe@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Call for potential ports maintainers Message-ID: <20090223085414.GB1364@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20090223012048.fe9e15bf.ota@j.email.ne.jp> References: <200902121232.30515.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> <20090223012048.fe9e15bf.ota@j.email.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 01:20:48AM -0500, Yoshihiro Ota wrote: > Can I make 2 suggestions? > > 1. Can you ask PR senders if they are intersted in becoming maintainer if port > doesn't have a maintaner? Sender was moticvated enough to make a patch. This is a good suggestion. I have only been following up on those when there is a maintainer-timeout, so I have not been looking at the unmaintained ones. > 2. Can you assign two or more maintainers to a port? This may improve > response time of PRs. We have discussed that in the past but it isn't really clear if all the tools we have work in that case. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090223085414.GB1364>