From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 8 17:04:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97872106566B; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:04:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5309F8FC15; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC661E065; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:04:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:04:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: ports-committers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20100708145213.GA56245@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <201007081251.o68CpcBF050697@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100708132111.GO31442@droso.net> <20100708145213.GA56245@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/lzma Makefile ports/archivers/paq Makefile ports/archivers/ppmd-7z Makefile ports/devel/abi-compliance-checker Makefile ports/devel/api-sanity-autotest Makefile ports/devel/distorm Makefile ports/devel/libdisasm ... X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:04:06 -0000 On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Sweeping commit is any commit that touches more than a couple of ports, > and it can even be more strict than that (e.g. shlib port update which > potentially can break things). Also please see RFC 1855 about excessive > quoting in email. Are you guys done now? Considering the change of an e-mail address as a sweeping commit in the context of a ports freeze for a release is an interpretation that may be "legally" correct, but really does not make any practical sense as far as the stated rationale is concerned. And Brendan apologized more than once nevertheless, so let's give him some rest. Gerald