Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:04:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: ports-committers@freebsd.org Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/lzma Makefile ports/archivers/paq Makefile ports/archivers/ppmd-7z Makefile ports/devel/abi-compliance-checker Makefile ports/devel/api-sanity-autotest Makefile ports/devel/distorm Makefile ports/devel/libdisasm ... Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1007081855340.8692@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> In-Reply-To: <20100708145213.GA56245@FreeBSD.org> References: <201007081251.o68CpcBF050697@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100708132111.GO31442@droso.net> <AANLkTimMCT8CHmiMcqL5hwgPZX0UF9VmTjwJjcCW-8l3@mail.gmail.com> <20100708145213.GA56245@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Sweeping commit is any commit that touches more than a couple of ports, > and it can even be more strict than that (e.g. shlib port update which > potentially can break things). Also please see RFC 1855 about excessive > quoting in email. Are you guys done now? Considering the change of an e-mail address as a sweeping commit in the context of a ports freeze for a release is an interpretation that may be "legally" correct, but really does not make any practical sense as far as the stated rationale is concerned. And Brendan apologized more than once nevertheless, so let's give him some rest. Gerald
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LNX.2.00.1007081855340.8692>