From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 18 23:48:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A43B37B410; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:48:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8J6lou13070; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 00:47:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8J6lZ700935; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 00:47:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200109190647.f8J6lZ700935@harmony.village.org> To: "Daniel O'Connor" Subject: Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Cc: David Xu , glenngombert@zdnetonebox.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Jordan Hubbard , Robert Withrow , Alexander Langer In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:57:52 +0930." References: Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 00:47:35 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message "Daniel O'Connor" writes: : X3 also supports more of the hardware out there than X4. X3 supports more OLDER hardware, while X4 supports some newer hardware better. X -configure is great when it works, but sucks otherwise. I've had both cases happen.. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message