From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 2 03:22:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26D616A4CE for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 03:22:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr (arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr [139.124.41.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4ED43D49 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 03:22:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) Received: from arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr (localhost.esil.univ-mrs.fr [127.0.0.1])iB23MECr068611; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 04:22:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) Received: (from rv@localhost) by arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iB23MDv5068610; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 04:22:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) X-Authentication-Warning: arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr: rv set sender to herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr using -f Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 04:22:13 +0100 From: Herve Quiroz To: Manfred Riem Message-ID: <20041202032213.GA68565@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> Mail-Followup-To: Manfred Riem , freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <200412020220.iB22KZVK053261@freefall.freebsd.org> <37919c3104120118576c06d50d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <37919c3104120118576c06d50d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/74574: Making NetBeans 4.0 available X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 03:22:16 -0000 Manfred, On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 08:57:53PM -0600, Manfred Riem wrote: > Your assumption is correct, note however that 4.0 is scheduled to be released > in mid December and 4.1 is already being worked on so netbeans-devel would > be 4.1. > > Making the 3.6 available as netbeans3 would be good. I would however go for > netbeans36 > > Let me know what we decide on so I can go ahead with delivering the port > Makefile and associated files. Unless you plan to have 3.6, 4.0 and 4.1 in the ports tree I don't think that the minor version number is mandatory here. OTOH as you suggest above, we could have the following in the future: - netbeans3 - netbeans (netbeans 4.0) - netbeans-devel (netbeans 4.1) For now I will request a repocopy of netbeans to netbeans-devel. We'll see how things go. Herve