Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Mar 2024 18:08:38 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 277333] Mk/Features/lto.mk: passing -C lto=no breaks LTO_UNSAFE ports
Message-ID:  <bug-277333-7788-OARDQcb7yq@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-277333-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-277333-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277333

--- Comment #17 from Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> ---
To summarize, WITH_LTO looks like crap to me:
- LTO_UNSAFE with inconsistent (CARGO_PROFILE_* vs. RUSTFLAGS) and unexpect=
ed
semantics (LTO_UNSAFE vs. WITHOUT_LTO)
- Modifies RUSTFLAGS without passing to MAKE_ENV (for ports *without*
USES=3Dcargo)
- Overrides individual CARGO_ENV assignemnets in consumers
- Fakes LTO in USES=3Dcabal (-Wl,--gc-sections is a different thing and com=
mon in
C/C++ world)

I may be wrong but you can easily test via devel/texlab which is fast to bu=
ild.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-277333-7788-OARDQcb7yq>