From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 02:41:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC0816A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 02:41:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0089243D1D for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 02:41:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from caelian@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so347772rne for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 18:41:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=mYtR3KAf3tIO4OxG24T6C0QEKL2eCyjLPCcXQgiF9W2YjMsv1ABKuu7O5FTzaMhdG4R+w2E0kEgS0Q1fTaAcVddnlBNfaPXCVhnMwVcAwhlKQBhMMRVQESeyH/h62I2qDh2Q+xtv/PxH+ZIOJaivL0fJ3yUgXjoIpP/OEkw7WTA= Received: by 10.38.11.60 with SMTP id 60mr73045rnk; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 18:40:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.89.69 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:40:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:40:43 -0800 From: Pascal Hofstee To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= In-Reply-To: <42028F29.1030801@DeepCore.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <42028F29.1030801@DeepCore.dk> cc: FreeBSD Current cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: ATA mkIII first official patches - please test! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pascal Hofstee List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 02:41:21 -0000 On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:52:57 +0100, S=F8ren Schmidt wrote= : > ATA-mkIII first official snapshot. Using it without any problems on a few days old 6.0-CURRENT (P2 400 MHz) I decided to take the plunge and go for the kernel-module-approach. The only thing i was curious about is if there is any way to build the kernel-module using ATA_STATIC_ID .. (as i used to do in my normal kernel-configs) Beyond that, it works like a charm :) --=20 Pascal Hofstee