From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 12:05:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D720C16A4E5 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:05:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from merlin.com.ua (Merlin.Com.UA [195.66.196.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5068543D5C for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:05:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sid@merlin.com.ua) Received: from H55_2.homeinet.loc (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merlin.com.ua (Postmaster) with ESMTP id E5EB4BEFD for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:04:32 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:02:26 -0700 From: sid@merlin.com.ua X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.10.03) Business X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1557380813.20040701150226@merlin.com.ua> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ipfw fwd X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: sid@merlin.com.ua List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:05:31 -0000 Hello freebsd-ipfw, does anyone think, what fwd is side feature, and we are using fwd because we do not have enougt route options ? why we cant write route add NETS1 for USERS1 gw 1.1.1.1 route add NETS2 for USERS1 gw 1.1.1.2 or route add from *** to ** gw *** or route add from any to NETS fwd *** ? if it will be done, what yet reason to use fwd ? (exept, of couse tcp-fwd to proxy and so on) I have 3 ISP connection, and couple of users. user can select provider by himself. it done with ipfw fwd, but IMHO what is not completelly ipfw task 8-\