Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Sep 2009 23:32:50 +0200
From:      Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
To:        Dan Naumov <dan.naumov@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: 7.2-release/amd64: panic, spin lock held too long
Message-ID:  <3bbf2fe10909121432x7bd4f7es497e9431c4e520d6@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <cf9b1ee00907061812r3da70018i1c8d8d12bb038a80@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <cf9b1ee00907061812r3da70018i1c8d8d12bb038a80@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov <dan.naumov@gmail.com>:
> I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
> "portsnap update", /var/log/messages shows the following:
>
> Jul  7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
> Jul  7 03:49:38 atom kernel: spin lock 0xffffffff80b3edc0 (sched lock
> 1) held by 0xffffff00017d8370 (tid 100054) too long
> Jul  7 03:49:38 atom kernel: panic: spin lock held too long
>
> /var/crash looks empty. This is a system running official 7.2-p1
> binaries since I am using freebsd-update to keep up with the patches
> (just updated to -p2 after this panic) running with very low load,
> mostly serving files to my home network over Samba and running a few
> irssi instances in a screen. What do I need to do to catch more
> information if/when this happens again?

Dan, is that machine equipped with Hyperthreading?

Attilio


-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3bbf2fe10909121432x7bd4f7es497e9431c4e520d6>