From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 22 3:46:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from thessaloniki.telehorizon.com (unknown [195.66.101.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242AD37B400 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 03:46:33 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by thessaloniki.telehorizon.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA41973; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 13:43:46 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from pgd@thessaloniki.telehorizon.com) From: pgd@telehorizon.com X-Authentication-Warning: thessaloniki.telehorizon.com: nobody set sender to pgd@telehorizon.com using -f To: Per Tore Larsen Subject: RE: NAT within a NAT Message-ID: <980163826.3a6c1cf213b3f@webmail.telehorizon.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 13:43:46 +0200 (EET) Cc: questions@freebsd.org References: <25879E6A7E74D411B9370050043B7F3E09F8D4@RUBICON> In-Reply-To: <25879E6A7E74D411B9370050043B7F3E09F8D4@RUBICON> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.3 X-Originating-IP: 195.66.101.98 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Here's what i've tried so far: I have setup my NAT using the 10.0.0.0 range. I set up the one of the NATed PCs to be a NAT server as well (using the 192.168.0.0 range). I've put a second network card in it and on this second card I have connected another PC (the new 192.168.0.0 sub-NAT-network). More or less the following situation (where you see a '#', it is a network card): 10.0.0.0 PC3 192.168.0.0 +----+ +-PC1 +----+ |1st | | |2nd | world<---#NAT #----+--------#NAT #-----PC4 |serv| | |serv| +----+ +-PC2 +----+ The problem is that the when I give on PC3 "ifconfig fxp1" (my second network card that gives to PC4) I get the frustrating message "no carrier". And of course PC4 gets "no rout to host".. Any ideas?? thanks, dimitri & paisios, PC. I use no DHCP .. Quoting Per Tore Larsen : > First of all, yes it's possible. > Setup the second NAT server in the same way you did on > first NAT server. > > The problem that might arise is when a machine on the > second LAN wants for axess the "world". This can be > solved for web by using a proxy but dunno how > ftp/telnet/ssh will behave. > > Try it on a test benchfirst and you will get your answer. > Also depending on you network, you could make FreeBSD answer > both net 192.168.1 and 192.168.2 using alias in ifconfig. > (If you use DHCP you might need to have two network adapters > to physically separate the networks) > > PeTe > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pgd@telehorizon.com [mailto:pgd@telehorizon.com] > > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 11:55 AM > > To: Freebsd > > Subject: NAT within a NAT > > > > > > Hello there, > > I have a LAN which is "hidden" from the world using NAT and i > > want to setup a > > sub-NAT-network within my LAN. That is: using another NAT > > server to hide this > > subnetwork from the rest of the LAN. > > > > Can anyone tell me if this is possible? > > > > bye, > > paisios > > > > (I hope I gave a clear picture of this peculiar situation..) > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message