Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 21:03:01 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, FreeBSD ports <ports@freebsd.org> Cc: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm@inbox.lv> Subject: Re: x11-wm/xwmm [WAS: Possibly unbuildable ports reminder] Message-ID: <200405142103.04809.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <40A51141.6000100@fillmore-labs.com> References: <200405141700.i4EH0gSp024041@freefall.freebsd.org> <200405142129.10156.andy@athame.co.uk> <40A51141.6000100@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_ofRpABML3MmWLSs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 14 May 2004 20:34, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > > > > As far as we are concerned, it's orphaned, and if someone else wants to > > maintain it they can. > > The point is: is it obsolete? Should it be removed from the ports tree? > I guess no one has better expertise than kde@ to decide on this. We wanted to remove it long ago, but there was loud demand we didn't, so we= =20 just dropped maintainership. Nobody in kde@ cares about qt23 anymore and I= =20 myself deny any expertise about it :-). However, the "problem" raised by Michael is bogus: qt23 conflicts with qt3x= =20 and a conflict isn't a bug and no grounds for removing anything either. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_ofRpABML3MmWLSs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBApRfoXhc68WspdLARAi4PAJ91pO2rtVhz4Ozz0HjRl1ykm8HS6ACdFXOw 1xtKoDVamg36I5U4SPgJhjU= =tGZ7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_ofRpABML3MmWLSs--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200405142103.04809.michaelnottebrock>