Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:34:13 +0100 From: Simon Wright <simon.wright@gmx.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -> portmaster Rosetta Stone? Message-ID: <4F5201B5.1040004@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20120303112341.GJ44287@home.opsec.eu> References: <CA%2BE3k93doEmK7YpiZLgBCB5WUmOeCCLLLQBak_-Nx8sGqiafhQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABzXLYM47FjwmEvKijOp41Hn0KhTTPJ-dnX58PxTS8oUff-THQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F4BA7CE.20107@FreeBSD.org> <20120303010602.6daeb272@cox.net> <4F51D392.8080605@FreeBSD.org> <20120303112341.GJ44287@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/03/12 12:23, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > The script that does this uses: > > portupgrade -arR -m BATCH=yes Hi Kurt Wouldn't portupgrade -a do exactly the same as -arR since -a affects all ports that have been updated and so by definition will build *updated* dependencies as well? Regards Simon.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F5201B5.1040004>