From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Mon Dec 21 17:09:31 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45155A4EDFB
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:09:31 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35C8B18CB
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:09:31 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tBLH9VZh082827
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:09:31 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 205476] x11-toolkits/wxgtk30 Provide backtrace option to
 configure
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:09:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: portmaster@bsdforge.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-205476-13-bt6U4uN7On@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-205476-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-205476-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:09:31 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205476

--- Comment #6 from Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> ---
(In reply to Kyle Evans from comment #2)
> Hello!
> 
> The attached patch didn't quite work out as planned- with a minor
> modification to remove the '!empty' while checking PORT_OPTIONS:MBACKTRACE-
> and testing against -CURRENT:
> 
> * Enabling the option enables backtrace as expected
> * Disabling the option disables backtrace as expected
> * The option is defaulted to backtrace disabled as expected
> 
> I will attach the revised version that I effectively used in these tests,
> for the sake of being perfectly explicit about the modification required. Do
> I need to go back to 9.3-RELEASE and 9-STABLE and prove this option is
> effectively a no-op there?

While I *did* examine (and approve) the patch. It looks fine.
I *think* a QA run that proves it's not possible to *enable*
Backtrace on a 9.x system, might be required.
*But* IMHO the patch (svn diff) speaks for itself. :-)

Thanks Kyle!

--Chris

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.