From owner-cvs-all Sun Jan 14 3:51: 0 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mobile.wemm.org (c1315225-a.plstn1.sfba.home.com [65.0.135.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D85037B401; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 03:50:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobile.wemm.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0EBoBQ90011; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 03:50:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <200101141150.f0EBoBQ90011@mobile.wemm.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Wilko Bulte Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , John Baldwin , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC In-Reply-To: <20010114123950.A47123@freebie.demon.nl> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 03:50:11 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 03:15:11AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: [..] > > The bottom line is that I feel the time is just about right to yank i386 > > entirely, not just taking it out of GENERIC. But I wont push for that > > Fine with me, but a change of policy as I see it. So, not something to sneak > in with a commit to GENERIC. Or ? I dont make policy. I just said what I think. While I agree with the commit John did, if I had my way (which I do not) I would have gone further. :-) Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message