From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 17:43:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBC7106566C for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:43:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ccowart@rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: from hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu (hal.Rescomp.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.70.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBAC8FC08 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1225) id ACEA5597D78; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:43:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:43:09 -0700 From: Chris Cowart To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20090914174309.GF37291@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="54u2kuW9sGWg/X+X" Content-Disposition: inline Organization: RSSP-IT, UC Berkeley User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: 8.0-BETA4 not responding to ARP for published entries X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:43:10 -0000 --54u2kuW9sGWg/X+X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, We have a system which makes heavy use of published arp entries. I know the arp code has been significantly overhauled in 8, but it looks like this functionality is now broken. $ arp -s 172.16.132.100 00:0c:29:16:bd:49 pub If I watch tcpdump on the interface, I see arp requests come in but no replies are sent. This is a clean build with no firewalls enabled. The syntax and descriptions don't appear to have changed in the man page, so I would expect this to still work as it has in the past. Please let me know if you need any other information and/or if I should get a PR open for this. If this is a regression, it would be great if it could get committed before the 8.0 release. Thanks, --=20 Chris Cowart Network Technical Lead Network & Infrastructure Services, RSSP-IT UC Berkeley --54u2kuW9sGWg/X+X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAwAGBQJKroCtAAoJEC8b9sM8ejXtS50P/3VX6gQl+uHgBMz+b/pkicNY KxnBDSCk33/xHAcXG0swsV5OwRHp+IA1emGfE1kGMAa9mG7a510psmi3rKPMtr5A amqgW1jJP+U/xkS5yawSBFygAra5x9/U1RpK23cyAGTHrxQii24ao0KZjdoopUjy BImKfFC5ao4Op9gQR3jz8/n6oxyQLogJMYnoMEECf1RWAya0WS8tZ7h9WlDASufF lfrhgSo9Ty7PHzjuKOSFj0AMcmwNh3omy1o/8qBGFVaN3+p59j1A08KjvbH4HuO7 1cfeYeGbxxNmsvF5kHb83xXAoVvo4OXnolUds67MtApXUm3ho5+gT6DrP+L9cHNE BjPjh5K8EGO0Yo417Gso2ffBhXUSIomZXOpU8CH9LDR8z//pH9oCFVrhR1pU/HjF S6suyGsdplYmjdTzExemk+zQM08XpwL44xVVaEO2debKfASn5P4+rUNQOpIUmdvc vr9yKlfefnwnyDvZ2EaU6GqUDLfEMC5m0/NUIDW4tU8AQGrBbq5q0oIjvEgNXy3M 9WFB7Qz0kHwK6cyQCCfYO6Qv8Nc7v1PSs1JxeCvoZQI5G98+kAPvbx3DhmEsk6My gXiDtCdPGGrfEJN4YYP14x5OynN3U86bVi/BJhX4hASgONC539aCmLrMg4whm0gC nulvCxIaqaOfgLPBr5OP =L3me -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --54u2kuW9sGWg/X+X--