From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 2 05:43:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2494316A403; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 05:43:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9B643D77; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 05:43:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.7/8.13.7/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id kA25hM0x010722; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 00:43:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 00:43:22 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Maxim Sobolev In-Reply-To: <45494692.5090200@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <454936CA.6060308@FreeBSD.org> <45494692.5090200@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]); Thu, 02 Nov 2006 00:43:23 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: "current@freebsd.org" , julian@elischer.org Subject: Re: libpthread shared library version number X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 05:43:33 -0000 On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: >> On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> >>> Guys, >>> >>> I have noticed that libpthread shared library version number in 6-STABLE >>> and 7-CURRENT is the same (.2), which causes all threaded application >>> compiled for 6-STABLE to segfault when executed on 7-CURRENT system, >>> unless libpthread.so.2 is replaced with with its 6-STABLE version which >>> in turn will create problems with threaded apps compiled for 7-CURRENT. >>> IMHO we should increase version number in 7-CURRENT, so that it is in the >>> line of what we have for other system libraries. >> >> It should be done as part of a larger set of library version bumps. >> All libraries should be bumped. I believe kan and kensmith were >> suppose to be looking at that. We wanted to enable symble versioning >> by default, so all libraries would need to be bumped. > > Well, as I said the rest of the libs have already been bumped between 6.x and > 7.x, I don't know if libpthread is exception. Perhaps somebody just missed it > out? When did this happen? Did I miss it? I know we bumped libc. -- DE