From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan 29 13:42:26 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA23518
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 13:42:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA23513
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 13:42:23 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199701292142.NAA23513@freefall.freebsd.org>
Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA227324136; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 08:42:16 +1100
From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: ipdivert & masqd
To: cmott@srv.net (Charles Mott)
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 08:42:16 +1100 (EDT)
Cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au, hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970129143012.969G-100000@darkstar> from "Charles Mott" at Jan 29, 97 02:31:47 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In some mail from Charles Mott, sie said:
> 
> > Well, in practice, the TIS FWTK/Gauntlet was sending the FTP PORT command
> > in two packets, so that Linux would break and so too did Firewall-1.
> > 
> > Darren
> > 
> 
> That is curious.  What does TIS FWTK/Gauntlet do?

does a send/write call for "PORT " and another for the address/port
info.

Darren